The land use change time-accounting failure
Abstract
Land use change (LUC) is the second largest human-induced source of greenhouse
gases. While LUC impacts are mostly immediate, policy makers consider it to be evenly
spread over time. In the context of public evaluation of projects, I theoretically show that,
as long as the discounting process perfectly offsets the rise of carbon prices, cost-benefit
analysis outcomes are not affected. When this condition does not hold, which is particular
to the global warming issue, the uniform time-accounting of LUC distorts present values
by emphasizing both the discounting process and the increase in the carbon price over time.
This induced bias is quantified in a case study of bioethanol in France. Depending on the
type of impact and discounting and carbon pricing assumptions, a downward/upward bias
between ±15% and ±30% of the LUC value is found. Two simple decision tools are pro-
vided to improve accounting of LUC impacts.
Domains
Economics and Finance
Origin : Files produced by the author(s)
Loading...